Ordit vs. Feedr — which is better for corporate catering?

Restaurants. Ordit partners with 300+ named London restaurants — Nando's, itsu, Farmer J, atis — so staff order from brands they already love. Feedr operates its own cloud kitchens: every meal is made to spec, consistent, but with no high-street names. For most teams, real restaurants drive noticeably higher adoption.

Feedr's standardised cloud-kitchen menus cost less per meal (£8–£12 versus Ordit's £10–£16, which varies by restaurant). But Feedr requires a 12-month minimum contract, while Ordit has none — and if a standardised menu drives low uptake, the cheaper meal is the one nobody eats. Neither platform charges setup fees.

Yes — Feedr's minimum term is 12 months, with possible penalties for leaving early. Ordit has no minimum contract: companies can cancel anytime, so there is no switching cost if priorities change.

Ordit integrates with Azure AD and Okta for SSO, and with SAP Concur, Workday and custom systems via daily SFTP feeds for expenses. Feedr supports Azure AD and SAP Concur only — notably, there is no Workday integration.

Feedr suits firms that want tight control over nutrition (it can design fully bespoke vegan, halal or organic menus), value cloud kitchens' food-waste reduction, and have teams that embrace standardisation over choice — and that are comfortable committing to a 12-month contract.